Alternarratives
People who disagree with the narrative are labeled as detached from reality, by those who hold it sacred, but what if the very narrative itself is detached from reality?
Obviously, getting people who've invested in the narrative to disagree with it, or agree with the alternarrative is a futile effort.
By detached from reality, I don't mean unfeasible, or implausible, but rather, meaningfully objectively inaccurate, relative to a set of verifiable facts, or observations.
I distinguish between verifiable facts and observations, because, while I may not be able to verify, and make a fact of the assertion that an individual exists, philosophically speaking, I can absolutely observe their being having an effect on mine.
While physics and philosophy may not be able to make irrefutable statements about the existence of an individual tackling me (they could very well be a composition of electrical impulses fed into my brain, as it floats in a vat), insofar as my, and the other brains in vats, can experience such, whether or not is verifiable as a fact that said event is actually happening, is irrelevant- I still got tackled.
Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that my sensory processing unit received a composite signal that is indistinguishable from being tackled.
Obviously, getting people who've invested in the narrative to disagree with it, or agree with the alternarrative is a futile effort.